Every submitted article should demonstrate scientific merit or novelty aligned with the journal's focus and scope. The Editor-in-Chief holds the authority to reject articles that deviate from the prescribed theme or fail to meet the Guidance for Authors requirements. Plagiarism-free content is mandatory, and authors are recommended to use plagiarism detection software for similarity checking such as TURNITIN. Each articles will be independently reviewed by a peer reviewer by Double Blind method. The decision for publication, amendment, or rejection is based upon their reports/recommendation. After incorporating feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will determine the final publication decision. The review process is expected to span approximately 1 to 3 months. There will be four kinds of editor decision based on reviewers recommendation:

> Accept Submission: The submission will be accepted without revisions.
> Revisions Required: The submission will be accepted after minor changes have been made.
> Resubmit for Review: The submission needs to be re-worked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. It will require a second round of review, however.
> Decline Submission: The submission will not be published in the journal.

Following the review process, all relevant information is communicated to the author. The author is expected to finalize the article within one or two weeks and submit the definitive version to the editors' office. Failure to return the article within this timeframe, or if the editorial board is not informed of any delay, will result in the article being declined.