Analisis Kebutuhan Literasi Dasar dan STEAM bagi Guru: Tantangan, Peluang, dan Rekomendasi dalam Pembelajaran di PAUD ‘Aisyiyah
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengeksplorasi tantangan, peluang, dan kebutuhan dalam implementasi literasi dasar dan
STEAM di PAUD ‘Aisyiyah Kota Jakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi
kasus instrumental. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan dokumentasi.
Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan metode analisis tematik berbantuan perangkat lunak NVivo. Kesimpulan
utama penelitian ini menekankan pada tiga aspek penting. Pertama, kebutuhan pelatihan berkelanjutan bagi guru
untuk meningkatkan kompetensi pedagogis. Kedua, pentingnya penyediaan sarana pembelajaran yang memadai.
Ketiga, perlunya penguatan kolaborasi antara sekolah, orang tua, dan komunitas pendidikan. Secara teoritis,
penelitian ini memperkaya literatur tentang penerapan STEAM pada tingkat PAUD di Indonesia, yang masih relatif
terbatas, dengan menawarkan perspektif kontekstual di lingkungan berbasis nilai Islam. Penelitian ini tidak hanya
memperkuat teori pendidikan PAUD namun juga membuka ruang untuk pengembangan model pembelajaran
inovatif yang berorientasi pada kebutuhan kontekstual dan nilai-nilai keagamaan. Secara praktis, hasil penelitian ini
memberikan rekomendasi konkret terhadap komunitas praktik profesional antarguru PAUD ‘Aisyiyah untuk
berbagi pengalaman, merefleksikan praktik, dan mengembangkan kompetensi literasi dan STEAM secara kolektif.
Dengan dukungan kebijakan, sumber daya, dan pelatihan berkelanjutan, guru PAUD ‘Aisyiyah dapat menjadi
motor penggerak dalam mewujudkan pendidikan inklusif dan bermutu sejak usia dini, sebagaimana ditargetkan
dalam Agenda SDGs 2030
Downloads
References
Rahman A. Implementasi STEAM di Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang dalam pendidikan PAUD. J Pendidik Anak Usia Dini. 2021;10(1):45–58.
Kim, M., & Park E. The challenges of STEAM education in early childhood settings: A literature review. Early Child Educ J. 2020;48(3):411–420.
NAEYC. Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. 2019.
Sagala M. The Use of Information Literacy For The Development Of Citizenship Character Interactions Of Citizenship Education In The Digital Era. Int J Students Educ. 2023;1(3):138–41.
Sagala MK, Rakhmawati I, Kadaritna N. Analysis Of Digital Literacy of Prospective Science Teacher Students in Online Learning. J Pendidik Teknol Inf dan Vokasional. 2021;3(2):110–7.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
Kim J-O, Kim J. Development and application of art based STEAM education program using educational robot. In: Robotic systems: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. IGI Global; 2020. p. 1675–87.
Hsiao P-W, Su C-H. A study on the impact of STEAM education for sustainable development courses and its effects on student motivation and learning. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3772.
Puryear JS, Lamb KN. Creativity knowledge of classroom teachers: Predictors and correlates. Think Ski Creat. 2024;54:101666.
Hadley EB, Barnes EM, Hwang H. Purposes, places, and participants: A systematic review of teacher language practices and child oral language outcomes in early childhood classrooms. Early Educ Dev. 2023;34(4):862–84.
MacDonald A, Huser C. Making STEM visible in early childhood curriculum frameworks. STEM Educ across Learn Contin Early Child to Sr Second. 2020;87–112.
Gerde HK, Bingham GE. Using the science of early literacy to design professional development for writing. Handb Sci Early Literacy; Cabell, SQ, Neuman, SB, Terry, NP, Eds. 2023;236–52.
Dejarnette N. Implementing STEAM in the Early Childhood Classroom. Eur J STEM Educ. 2018 Sep;3.
UNESCO. Early Childhood Education in the Digital Age. UNESCO Reports on Education. New York: UNESCO Reports on Education; 2023.
Avery A, Cresswell K, Crowe S, Huby G, Robertson A, Sheikh A. The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):100–8.
Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13(4):544–59.
in RK. Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford publications; 2015.
Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. Vol. 5. sage; 2009.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications; 2016.
Morgan H. Conducting a qualitative document analysis. Qual Rep. 2022;27(1):64–77.
Braun V, Clarke V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qual Psychol. 2022;9(1):3.
OCDE. The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. OECD Educ Work Pap [Internet]. 2018;23. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030 Position Paper (05.04.2018).pdf
National Early Literacy Panel. Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel: A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications of intervention. USA: National Institute for Literacy; 2008.
Bers MU. Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom. Routledge; 2020.
Henderson AT, Mapp KL. A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family, and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Annual Synthesis, 2002. ERIC; 2002.
Plowman L. Rethinking context: Digital technologies and children’s everyday lives. Child Geogr. 2016;14(2):190–202.
Allman B, Kimmons R, Rosenberg J, Dash M. Trends and topics in educational technology, 2023 edition. TechTrends. 2023;67(3):583–91.
Copyright (c) 2025 Meyke Garzia, Khusniyati Masykuroh, Nelis Nazziatus Sadiah Qosyasih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
